Remembering when Words are Mutually Exclusive
نویسنده
چکیده
During the second year of life, infants develop a ‘mutual exclusivity’ bias to attach novel object labels to novel, nameunknown objects, rather than familiar, name-known objects (Markman, 1989). In an intermodal preferential looking experiment with 19.5and 22.5-month-old infants, stimulus repetition was critical for observing mutual exclusivity. On the first occasion that a novel label was presented with a familiar and novel object, looking behaviour was unsystematic. Upon re-exposure to the same stimuli, 22.5month-olds looked preferentially at the novel object prior to the re-presentation of the novel label. These findings suggest a powerful memory mechanism for novel labels and objects, enabling mutual exclusivity to emerge across repeated exposures to potential referents.
منابع مشابه
Cross-situational Word Learning Respects Mutual Exclusivity
Learners are able to infer the meanings of words by observing the consistent statistical association between words and their referents, but the nature of the learning mechanisms underlying this process are unknown. We conducted an artificial cross-situational word learning experiment in which either words consistently appeared with multiple objects (extra object condition) or objects consistent...
متن کاملUC Merced Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society Title
Learners are able to infer the meanings of words by observing the consistent statistical association between words and their referents, but the nature of the learning mechanisms underlying this process are unknown. We conducted an artificial cross-situational word learning experiment in which either words consistently appeared with multiple objects (extra object condition) or objects consistent...
متن کاملMutually Exclusive Procedures in Imperative Languages
To represent mutually exclusive procedures, we propose a choice-conjunctive declaration statement of the form uchoo(S,R) where S,R are the procedure declaration statements within a module. This statement has the following semantics: request the machine to choose a successful one between S and R. This statement is useful for representing objects with mutually exclusive procedures. We illustrate ...
متن کاملMutually Exclusive Rules in LogicWeb
LogicWeb has traditionally lacked devices for expressing mutually exclusive clauses. We address this limitation by adopting choice-conjunctive clauses of the form D0&D1 where D0,D1 are Horn clauses and & is a linear logic connective. Solving a goal G using D0&D1 – pv(D0&D1, G) – has the following operational semantics: choose a successful one between pv(D0, G) and pv(D1, G). In other words, if ...
متن کاملLearning words: children disregard some pragmatic information that conflicts with mutual exclusivity.
Children tend to infer that when a speaker uses a new label, the label refers to an unlabeled object rather than one they already know the label for. Does this inference reflect a default assumption that words are mutually exclusive? Or does it instead reflect the result of a pragmatic reasoning process about what the speaker intended? In two studies, we distinguish between these possibilities....
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008